tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post2771122705823660198..comments2023-10-06T15:01:30.680-04:00Comments on The Dikdukian: ככר זהבShtiklerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07498936768989355610noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-39184326416705364652016-02-11T11:08:06.487-05:002016-02-11T11:08:06.487-05:00A) Anonymous said...
can't think about this no...A) Anonymous said...<br />can't think about this now, but would there be a taam maphsik there if it is semikhut?<br /><br />B) Doniel said...<br />See Rashi to parshas Titzaveh 29:30 that a tivir is "nimshach lifanav" even though it is a melech.<br /><br />"Nimshach Lefanav" doesn't mean in semichut; "hakohen" is not in semichut there, so that posuk isn't a proof.<br /><br />In a three word phrase, as we have here ("Kikar Zahav Tahor"), where the first two words are in semichut and the third modifies the middle word, we find many times (in fact it's very common) that the first word gets a ta'am mafsik and the middle gets a taam mesharet, so the ta'amim are not a proof to semichut here.<br /><br />I.E.: V'Chol Ziknei HaIr Hahee (Deut. 21:6)<br /><br /><br />MGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-67167066682674151282016-02-11T10:46:59.936-05:002016-02-11T10:46:59.936-05:001) See Torah Temimah and the Netziv who make a big...1) See Torah Temimah and the Netziv who make a big deal out of this supposed semichut<br />2) The more accurate manuscripts have a kamatz here (I believe only the 2nd Rabbinic Bible aka Bomberg's Mikraot Gedolot has a patach here and that's where all the "shul" chumashim got it from)<br />3) One cannot bring proof to the Mesorah from Onkelos<br />4) There are manuscript versions of Onkelos without the daled of semichut, and if I recall correctly those are the more accurate versions<br />5) Onkelos will use a semichut construct even when it's clear from the text that there is no semichutMGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-89581386173640797472011-02-01T16:07:48.303-05:002011-02-01T16:07:48.303-05:00רציתי להוסיף שגרסת ברויאר ככר בקמץ
היא עיקר
מה ש...רציתי להוסיף שגרסת ברויאר ככר בקמץ <br /><br />היא עיקר<br />מה שצוין תרגום סביוניטה הוא כאן<br />http://www.hebrewbooks.org/home.aspxelienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-19000085000842951812007-03-05T12:48:00.000-05:002007-03-05T12:48:00.000-05:00See Rashi to parshas Titzaveh 29:30 that a tivir i...See Rashi to parshas Titzaveh 29:30 that a tivir is "nimshach lifanav" even though it is a melech.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-13014122865905008542007-02-26T15:14:00.000-05:002007-02-26T15:14:00.000-05:00forgot to sign the above:-ari kinsbergagmk.blogspo...forgot to sign the above:<BR/><BR/>-ari kinsberg<BR/>agmk.blogspot.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-50169040352294707712007-02-26T15:13:00.000-05:002007-02-26T15:13:00.000-05:00can't think about this now, but would there be a t...can't think about this now, but would there be a taam maphsik there if it is semikhut?<BR/><BR/>nice blogAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com