tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post8811045946986137148..comments2023-10-06T15:01:30.680-04:00Comments on The Dikdukian: Of plurals and singularsShtiklerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07498936768989355610noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-63156668988536813112012-03-02T12:21:10.791-05:002012-03-02T12:21:10.791-05:00And for ספרדים not?
I understand it would be chuat...And for ספרדים not?<br />I understand it would be chuatnot. But your point was the erroneous "kaf," correct?Shtiklerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07498936768989355610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-18318091407634678652012-03-02T11:56:23.293-05:002012-03-02T11:56:23.293-05:00For Ashkenazim it would be ChutanosFor Ashkenazim it would be ChutanosN M Edingernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1866132022161856151.post-69661648978694702122007-03-05T13:16:00.000-05:002007-03-05T13:16:00.000-05:00Shkoyach!Shkoyach!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com